SciLit

Activating evidence-based thinking mode...

Skip to main content
Science Literacy for Human Rights
Scientific Foundations

References & Sources

Our content is based on the latest scientific research in critical thinking, media literacy, and educational gamification.

Academic Publications

The peer-reviewed research that underpins our pedagogical approach.

3 Inoculation Theory and Prebunking

van der Linden, S. (2024)

Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects Our Minds and How to Build Immunity

W.W. Norton

Harvard Goldsmith Prize 2024

View source

Biddlestone, M. et al. (2025)

Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos

Political Psychology

View source

Roozenbeek, J. & van der Linden, S. (2019)

Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation

Palgrave Communications, 5, 65

View source

1 Debunking and Correction

Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U.K.H. et al. (2020)

The Debunking Handbook 2020

Consensus document by 22 researchers

View source

2 SIFT Method and Verification

Caulfield, M. (2019)

SIFT (The Four Moves)

Hapgood

View source

Wineburg, S. & McGrew, S. (2019)

Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information

Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1-40

View source

8 Cognitive Biases

Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M. & Cichocka, A. (2017)

The psychology of conspiracy theories

Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542

View source

Fazio, L.K., Pillai, R.M. & Patel, D. (2022)

The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2604-2613

View source

Simons, D.J. & Chabris, C.F. (1999)

Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events

Perception, 28(9), 1059-1074

View source

Asch, S.E. (1956)

Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority

Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1-70

View source

Franzen, A. & Mader, S. (2023)

The power of social influence: A replication and extension of the Asch experiment

PLoS One, 18(11), e0294325

View source

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974)

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131

View source

Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999)

Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134

View source

Wikipedia contributors (2025)

List of cognitive biases

Wikipedia

View source

4 Media Literacy

NAMLE (2024)

Snapshot 2024: The State of Media Literacy Education in the U.S.

National Association for Media Literacy Education

View source

UNESCO (2024)

Media and Information Literacy: Policy and Strategy Guidelines

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

View source

Goffman, E. (1974)

Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience

Harvard University Press

View source

Entman, R.M. (1993)

Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm

Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58

View source

5 Educational Gamification

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990)

Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience

Harper & Row

Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000)

The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior

Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268

View source

Chou, Y.-K. (2015)

Actionable Gamification: Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards

Octalysis Media

View source

Sailer, M. & Homner, L. (2020)

The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis

Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77-112

View source

Zeng, X. et al. (2024)

Exploring the impact of gamification on students' academic performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis

British Journal of Educational Technology

View source

1 Echo Chambers and Polarization

Hartmann, D., Wang, S.M., Pohlmann, L. & Berendt, B. (2025)

A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes

Journal of Computational Social Science, 8(2)

View source

5 Science & Environment

Legagneux, P. et al. (2018)

Our house is burning: Discrepancy in climate change vs. biodiversity coverage in the media

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 175

View source

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1971)

Belief in the law of small numbers (sample size and reliability)

Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105-110

View source

Bickel, P.J., Hammel, E.A. & O'Connell, J.W. (1975)

Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data from Berkeley (Simpson's paradox)

Science, 187(4175), 398-404

View source

Simpson, E.H. (1951)

The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(2), 238-241

View source

Vigen, T. (2015)

Spurious Correlations

tylervigen.com

View source

Key Researchers

The scientists whose work has shaped our approach.

Sander van der Linden

University of Cambridge

Pioneer of inoculation theory and prebunking. Author of 'Foolproof'.

Mike Caulfield

University of Washington

Creator of the SIFT method and information verification expert.

Stephan Lewandowsky

University of Bristol

Co-author of the Debunking Handbook and misinformation psychology expert.

Karen Douglas

University of Kent

Expert in the psychology of conspiracy theories.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

Claremont Graduate University

Creator of Flow theory - optimal experience in learning.

Yu-kai Chou

Octalysis Group

Gamification expert and creator of the Octalysis framework.

Ready to develop your critical thinking?

Discover our interactive modules based on this scientific research.

Start the modules

A European project

Scientific Literacy as a Catalyst for Change: Addressing Pseudoscience and Science Disinformation in relation to Human Rights

A partnership of six organizations from Romania, France, Italy, Hungary, Slovenia, and Bulgaria.

ASUR
Mythodologie
CICAP
SOYA
Zavod Boter
ECIESC
Co-funded by the European Union

This project is co-funded by the European Union under the Erasmus+ programme. The content reflects the authors' views only, and the European Commission and National Agency cannot be held responsible for any use of this information.

Project reference: 2025-1-RO01-KA220-YOU-000357084