SciLit

Sestavljanje uganke kritičnega mišljenja...

Skoči na glavno vsebino
Science Literacy for Human Rights
Znanstvene osnove

Reference in viri

Naša vsebina temelji na najnovejših znanstvenih raziskavah kritičnega mišljenja, medijske pismenosti in izobraževalne igrifikacije.

Akademske publikacije

Recenzirane raziskave, ki so temelj našega pedagoškega pristopa.

3 Teorija inokulacije in Prebunking

van der Linden, S. (2024)

Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects Our Minds and How to Build Immunity

W.W. Norton

Harvard Goldsmith Prize 2024

Ogled vira

Biddlestone, M. et al. (2025)

Tune in to the prebunking network! Development and validation of six inoculation videos

Political Psychology

Ogled vira

Roozenbeek, J. & van der Linden, S. (2019)

Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation

Palgrave Communications, 5, 65

Ogled vira

1 Debunking in popravki

Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Ecker, U.K.H. et al. (2020)

The Debunking Handbook 2020

Consensus document by 22 researchers

Ogled vira

2 Metoda SIFT in preverjanje

Caulfield, M. (2019)

SIFT (The Four Moves)

Hapgood

Ogled vira

Wineburg, S. & McGrew, S. (2019)

Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information

Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1-40

Ogled vira

8 Kognitivne pristranskosti

Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M. & Cichocka, A. (2017)

The psychology of conspiracy theories

Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542

Ogled vira

Fazio, L.K., Pillai, R.M. & Patel, D. (2022)

The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(10), 2604-2613

Ogled vira

Simons, D.J. & Chabris, C.F. (1999)

Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events

Perception, 28(9), 1059-1074

Ogled vira

Asch, S.E. (1956)

Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority

Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1-70

Ogled vira

Franzen, A. & Mader, S. (2023)

The power of social influence: A replication and extension of the Asch experiment

PLoS One, 18(11), e0294325

Ogled vira

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974)

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131

Ogled vira

Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999)

Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134

Ogled vira

Wikipedia contributors (2025)

List of cognitive biases

Wikipedia

Ogled vira

4 Medijska pismenost

NAMLE (2024)

Snapshot 2024: The State of Media Literacy Education in the U.S.

National Association for Media Literacy Education

Ogled vira

UNESCO (2024)

Media and Information Literacy: Policy and Strategy Guidelines

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

Ogled vira

Goffman, E. (1974)

Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience

Harvard University Press

Ogled vira

Entman, R.M. (1993)

Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm

Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58

Ogled vira

5 Izobraževalna igrifikacija

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990)

Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience

Harper & Row

Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000)

The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior

Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268

Ogled vira

Chou, Y.-K. (2015)

Actionable Gamification: Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards

Octalysis Media

Ogled vira

Sailer, M. & Homner, L. (2020)

The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis

Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77-112

Ogled vira

Zeng, X. et al. (2024)

Exploring the impact of gamification on students' academic performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis

British Journal of Educational Technology

Ogled vira

1 Odmevne sobe in polarizacija

Hartmann, D., Wang, S.M., Pohlmann, L. & Berendt, B. (2025)

A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes

Journal of Computational Social Science, 8(2)

Ogled vira

5 Znanost in okolje

Legagneux, P. et al. (2018)

Our house is burning: Discrepancy in climate change vs. biodiversity coverage in the media

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 175

Ogled vira

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1971)

Belief in the law of small numbers (sample size and reliability)

Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105-110

Ogled vira

Bickel, P.J., Hammel, E.A. & O'Connell, J.W. (1975)

Sex Bias in Graduate Admissions: Data from Berkeley (Simpson's paradox)

Science, 187(4175), 398-404

Ogled vira

Simpson, E.H. (1951)

The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(2), 238-241

Ogled vira

Vigen, T. (2015)

Spurious Correlations

tylervigen.com

Ogled vira

Ključni raziskovalci

Znanstveniki, katerih delo je oblikovalo naš pristop.

Sander van der Linden

University of Cambridge

Pionir teorije inokulacije in prebunkinga. Avtor knjige 'Foolproof'.

Mike Caulfield

University of Washington

Ustvarjalec metode SIFT in strokovnjak za preverjanje informacij.

Stephan Lewandowsky

University of Bristol

Soavtor Debunking Handbook in strokovnjak za psihologijo dezinformacij.

Karen Douglas

University of Kent

Strokovnjakinja za psihologijo teorij zarote.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

Claremont Graduate University

Ustvarjalec teorije Flow - optimalna izkušnja učenja.

Yu-kai Chou

Octalysis Group

Strokovnjak za igrifikacijo in ustvarjalec ogrodja Octalysis.

Avtorji glasbe

Glasbo v ozadju animacij uporabljamo v skladu z njihovimi licencami. Hvala avtorjem.

Avtorji fotografij

Fotografije v animacijah in dejavnostih izhajajo z Wikimedia Commons. Obrezane so; obrezane različice slik CC BY-SA ostajajo pod isto licenco.

Si pripravljen razviti svoje kritično mišljenje?

Odkrij naše interaktivne module, ki temeljijo na teh znanstvenih raziskavah.

Začni z moduli

Evropski projekt

Znanstvena pismenost kot gonilo sprememb: soočanje s psevdoznanostjo in znanstvenimi dezinformacijami v povezavi s človekovimi pravicami

Partnerstvo šestih organizacij iz Romunije, Francije, Italije, Madžarske, Slovenije in Bolgarije.

ASUR
Mythodologie
CICAP
SOYA
Zavod Boter
ECIESC
Co-funded by the European Union

Ta projekt sofinancira Evropska unija v okviru programa Erasmus+. Vsebina odraža samo mnenja avtorjev, Evropska komisija in Nacionalna agencija pa ne moreta biti odgovorni za kakršno koli uporabo teh informacij.

Referenca projekta: 2025-1-RO01-KA220-YOU-000357084